In neither case, though, do the algorithms remove the post the programs flag the posts to be reviewed by people.įacebook’s challenge is getting its technology to work well enough that its roughly 15,000 human reviewers can reliably pick up the slack, in each of the more than 100 countries and languages the service is used. Some 15 percent of posts removed for bullying are identified and taken down before anyone has reported them. Facebook says that just over half of hate speech removed from the platform in the most recent three months was flagged first by algorithms, more than double the proportion earlier in the year. It’s working proof of the idea that an algorithmic immune system can help shelter Facebook users from harmful content-and the company from the consequences of hosting it. Still, the success of Gibbs’ project in fighting pornography has become a favorite talking point of Facebook executives touting the potential of AI to clean up their service. This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from. “To me AI is the best tool to implement the policy-I actually don't know what the alternative is.” “I think most people would feel uncomfortable with that,” Schroepfer says, eliding the possibility users may find it creepy to have algorithms review their every post. With 2.3 billion regular users, having everything reviewed by humans would be prohibitively expensive-and creepy. Mike Schroepfer, the company’s chief technology officer, says the technology is the only way to prevent bad actors from taking advantage of the service. Many of Facebook’s apologies exhibit a common theme: Artificial intelligence will help solve the problems incubating on the company's platform. Monday, a Senate report said Russia's activities on Facebook properties were far greater than previously known, and suggested the the company misled Congress by downplaying the idea that Russian trolls used its product to suppress turnout during the 2016 presidential election.
They include enabling Russian election interference and employment discrimination, in addition to being accessory to genocide in Myanmar.
#Ai image cleaner series#
It would, he told lawmakers, fight fake news, prevent ads that discriminate on the grounds of race or gender, and hobble terrorist propaganda.įacebook has faced a dizzying series of accusations and scandals over the past year. During two days of congressional hearings, Zuckerberg mentioned AI more than 30 times. “Over the long term, building AI tools is going to be the scalable way to identify and root out most of this harmful content,” he said. Then he expounded on a favorite topic-artificial intelligence. The impassive then-33-year-old billionaire noted that he had hired more Burmese speakers. In the US Capitol in April, Senator Jeff Flake asked Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg how his company might have avoided that role. The mission’s chair told journalists that the site had played a “determining role” in the crisis. Another general wrote to praise the “brilliant effort to restore regional peace,” observing that “race cannot be swallowed by the ground but only by another race.” A UN fact-finding report on the violence later cited the commander-in-chief’s post as suggestive of genocide, and noted the history of Facebook posts whipping up hate against Rohingya in Myanmar. As Rohingya died by the thousands, Myanmar’s military leaders took to Facebook.Ī post from the commander-in-chief pledged to solve “the Bengali problem,” using a pejorative for Rohingya in Myanmar.
Security forces quickly retaliated with a campaign of village burning and mass killings that lasted weeks. 25, 2017, a ragged insurgent group from Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslim minority attacked military outposts in the country’s northwest, killing 12 people.
0 kommentar(er)
